Kolkata continues strike, Digvijaya Singh on RSS stance.

The West Bengal government appointed a new police commissioner for Kolkata and removed two senior officials of the health department. The agitating junior doctors on Wednesday described their movement as “a partial victory” while seeking another meeting with Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee.

The decisions were taken during a general body meeting to decide on further course of action after chief minister Mamata Banerjee claimed that her government has accepted “99%” of junior doctors’ demands. But at the same time, she appealed to them to return to work as the pressure put on the state’s medical infrastructure is already huge.

Joining families of arrested activists, which included ex-JNU student Umar Khalid, Congress veteran Digvijaya Singh said Tuesday that when the grieved party is Muslim, bail is seldom being granted. He stated that the targeting of Muslims in India is similar to Hitler’s persecution of Jews during his regime in Germany.

A doctor’s strike has come to bring the healthcare sector of Kolkata to a grinding halt. The protest reflects a much deeper concern within the medical fraternity. It also throws a big question mark over the much larger issue of state healthcare in India. Meanwhile, political temperature is going to rise as Digvijaya Singh criticizes RSS for targeting Muslims. Issues like these require immediate attention and realization.

The strike began after the incident of violence against doctors. The medical fraternity reacted as a protest against an attack on a junior doctor.
They demanded law enforcement and a safer place to work. The last few years saw a constant increase in attacks on health professionals. majority of them were the fruits of the frustration of patients’ family members owing to the poor outcome of treatments. The work of doctors is considered essential.

Yet, doctors have to endure extreme pressure from the patients and their families. As the doctors continued to strike, most hospitals in Kolkata failed to function properly. Many facilities had to curtail their services or close departments in toto, since many doctors remained absent. OPDs lay vacant while, where such facilities exist, patients had to encounter delays in emergency services. Such disruptions affected the patients, especially those who came from rural areas, much personally.

The state government had, therefore, appealed to the doctors to resume their duties. The state government merely directed them to resume work without giving a concrete direction toward resolving the issue. Switching back to dialogue, the government threatened disciplinary actions. Still, the doctors continued with their protest and insisted on their stand.
Public outcry increased, especially as patients felt the impact of delayed or denied care.

Despite this, doctors persisted that they needed stronger protections not only for their safety but also to protect the health-care system in general. They maintained that, without solving the problem of violence, standards in the health sector would continue deteriorating. The longer the strike was ongoing, the clearer it became that this problem was no isolated incident. It therefore brought to light an even deeper systemic flaw in India’s healthcare structure. H4: Role of Media and Public Perception

Media houses immediately took up the story and gave a wide cover of the strike. The reporters interviewed both protesting doctors and suffering patients to give the public a balanced view of the situation. On one side, doctors explained the reasons for the strike, focusing on matters of safer working conditions. On the other side were patients and their families, frustratingly pining for delayed services.

Public opinion was also manipulated by social media. Online, hashtags from either side dominated the trend lines, with people discussing whether the strike was ethically justifiable or not. However, some called the doctors’ move necessary while others stated the move would take away innocent lives. The polarized opinions only reflected the greater complexity of the issue. However, one common point was seen between both- the healthcare system badly required reform.

Digvijaya Singh Comments Against the RSS

Amid the doctors’ strike, political tensions emerged as Congress leader Digvijaya Singh targeted the RSS. Singh had accused the organization of targeting Muslims at many social and political levels. This has added a new level of complexity to the already tensed situation in the country.

Digvijaya Singh made the comments at a time when the RSS came under attack for its role in shaping public opinion and policymaking. Singh leveled several allegations against the organization, the most important being the charges of cultivating divisive ideologies, particularly against minority communities. Publically reacting controversially to Singh’s remark, the debate filtered across political lines, with the supporters of the RSS presenting its stand and branding Singh with practicing identity politics.

The doctors’ strike and Digvijaya Singh’s attack on the RSS are events that may sound very unrelated. However, both represent the ever-increasing unrest in India. Healthcare being a fundamental service cannot be run well unless proper support and security are offered to its workers. At the same time, political tensions increase the tensions within society even further, so that cohesion becomes increasingly difficult.

Where the doctors are asking for a better safety and working condition, religious minority debates have been inciting the bases for the fissure in political discourse. It does not only apply to the health sector but other aspects of life; and these issues therefore underscore the need for outright reform.

Some problems are too deep and so widely spread that any palliative solution simply cannot do. It calls for systemic reform.

The Way Forward: Crisis Resolution

The government needs to solve the doctors’ strike at its core level. Getting doctors back to work simply will not do the trick. Strengthened laws which would minimize violence against health care workers are a necessity. A larger investment by the government in upgrading the infrastructure of public hospitals would dilute the burden of doctors.

On the political front, leaders must engage in constructive dialogue to ease communal tensions. Accusations and counter-accusations only serve to deepen divisions. Political leaders should focus on building an inclusive society that values all citizens, irrespective of their background.

Conclusion: A Call for Urgent Action

The present doctors’ strike in Kolkata has brought forth serious inefficiency in the health sector. Unless this situation is rectified soon, both the medical practitioners and the patients are likely to suffer alike. During this time, political discussion must change from one of pigeonholing to uniting each other. Solutions to both these will only be possible through collective thinking and understanding with a high level of future approach. Only then can India march forward, providing safety to its medical practitioners and inclusion to all citizens.

SOURCES

For more information- https://viralenews.com/