Many people will never forget the number of times Donald Trump vowed to put an end to birthright citizenship. Most of the time, this promise was made in union with another concerning issue: birth tourism. According to the Constitution, any child born on U.S. territory becomes a citizen of this country automatically, and such provisions have existed ever since the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified in 1868. But the Trump Ikon blames the administration for trying to challenge and change this policy. This piece addresses the roots of the immigration reform political promise by Donald Trump and its effects that people expect to see in future US citizenship laws.
1. Birthright Citizenship: The Basic of the Basics
Birthright citizenship, or jus soli, implies that children born in the United States will automatically become US citizens regardless of the legal status of the parents.\The first section of the amendment reads, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
It guarantees, in this case, that every child born in the US will have the right of a US citizenship regardless of the legal capacity of their parents. This clause, however, has been the subject of many debates, especially with regards to birth tourism and immigration policy reform.
2. The Birthright Citizenship Combat: The Release Button for the Trump Presidency
Birthright citizenship was one of the issues that Donald Trump never failed to mention during his presidency. He asserted that the showed illegal immigration, and especially of the child born in the U.S., who ultimately becomes the target of the illegal immigration of the parents. The intention behind the term ‘birth tourism’ can be explained as, a pregnant woman moves to the U.S. from a country with provisions to allow immigration to give birth there in return for an American citizenship to their child.
\. He believed such birthright citizenship allows foreigners to use American immigration law loophole where they can simply give birth in America. His administration sought to put an end to what they perceived as an immigration loophole by discontinuing birthright citizenship for kids born by non-citizen parents.
Trump maintained that the 14th Amendment was not intended to provide citizenship to children born in America to parents who were illegal immigrants. Some legal scholars opposed this view, but Trump claimed that it is only the Congress or president who has the authority to do something about the ‘habit’.
Read more- Key Administrative Appointments Of Donald Trump
3. The Purpose of Birth Tourism in the Argument Presented by Trump
The issue of birth tourism has notably formed the context in which Trump sought to end birthright citizenship. It has been reported that some foreign women such as those from China, Russia and some other parts of Latin America, would go to the US for giving birth so that their child could automatically obtain US citizenship. These children would then be able to reside in America and possibly also be able to petition for their parents’ green card in the future.
The opponents of birth tourism state that it takes advantage of US immigration laws and helps the ones willing to afford the travel to the US for this reason to have a better position than others. This was the narrative around which Trump built this argument as he regarded birth tourism as a very serious issue which deserved its place in the wider debate concerning the reform of immigration policies.
4. Legal and Constitutional Issues
For instance, some think that Trump would attempt such a thing in order to garner a decision from the US supreme court which would try to reframe the long held interpretations of the 14th amendment. But in practice, these alternatives would be very difficult to attempt and would definitely meet strong legal and political resistance.
5. The Wider Context: National security and Immigration Reform
Trump’s removal of birthright citizenship was along the lines of his immigration reform policies, his bedrock policy which according to him built the foundation of his presidency. Trump was adamant about America’s security and illegal immigration, determining that there was a need to take a hard stance on all immigration-related issues. He claimed that doing away with citizenship by birth will eliminate a huge loophole from the current immigration system.
In response, some mild temper critics mentioned of the US Constitution that it would in the long run set a precedent and argued all along that to take the 14th amendment out was political propaganda since the main objective was to restore American equality and justice after the civil war, especially for Africans and should never have been tampered with.
Bullies of the reverse, however, reversed the policy from the front that it was necessary for the Americans to uphold principles of the United States. In addition, they state that birthright citizenship has been essential in averting the formation of stateless people who would over time become opportunistic and possess no territory.
6. The Impact on Immigrant Communities
If indeed Trump was successful in getting rid of the policies that promote birthright citizenship inclusion, there would have been dire consequences for the immigrant sections of the American society. Families with parents with illegal status might have faced a situation where their American children might not be citizens nor be granted citizenship. This would have put more than two million children currently born in the US to immigrant families in chaos.
The removal of birthright citizenship could have further deepened the already existing tensions around immigration, making it ever more difficult to address the immigration crisis comprehensively. It may also portray America as a state that does not extend citizenship to all children born on its territory and this would damage America’s image as a state that supports inclusivity and equality.
7. The Relationship Between Trump’s Promise and Politicization.
. For his base, it was an enduring link to their nationalism and the rule over immigrants. For his critics, it marked a change in civil rights that had existed for decades.
\ Other ‘Republican faces’ have also reinforced his language on the issue and have emphasized a need for effective immigration policies whilst making citizenship exclusive.
Conclusion: An Issues with the Extra Waits Perspective.
The case with Donald Trump, where he claimed he’ll terminate birth tourism and end birthright citizenship allowed the discussion on the subject become much louder than what it was previously and allowed many Americans to understand how complicated the U.S. immigration law is. Although the announcement made by his administration along with other political actors to remove birthright citizenship had a degree of success, there were legal and political challenges that tempered their ambitions – the issue was very much in the spotlight however.
The controversy on birthright citizenship touches on the more existential issues regarding American nationality, constitutional interpretation, and the direction of future immigration reforms. In the context of the United States’s ongoing debates regarding immigration, trump’s vow is still indicative of the rift between securing the country’s borders and upholding the dignity of immigrants and their families. Click here for the source
